1. Page 217 of _Drugs in the Workplace_
(Jackson and Brooks 217).
Just (Jackson 217). is acceptable too, as long as there are no other articles
by Jackson or by Jackson and different co-author on the works cited page.
2. Page 455 of "Mandatory Drug Testing and the Courts"
3. Pages 115 through 117 of _Studies on Office Management_
Notice the number drops the hundreds for the continued pages, but only
4. Page 105 of "Employees Object to Testing"
5. Page 34 through 35 of volume 1 of _Case Studies of Drugs and Business_
The volume number is important here because all volumes in a set have
the same author, same title and all start on page 1.
How would the reader
know to which page 34 you referred without the volume number?
uses a colon : between the volume and the pages; notice the numbers
not drop to the ones--not 34-5.
6. Page 107 of "Employees Object to Testing" if another source by Julio Llosa
appeared in the same Works Cited listing.
(Llosa, "Employees" 107).
You need to have the title--or a portion of the title--of the work being used
differentiate this source from the other by the same author. Using
title is acceptable, but why bother typing more than you have to? :)
7. A quotation from Gayle Stein's _Drug Testing and Rehabilitation Programs_
that is quoted on page 471 of Theresa VanBeck's "Mandatory Drug Testing
and the Courts."
(qtd. in VanBeck 471).
This is called an "indirect citation." Remember your reader is interested
what YOU found, not where the information "could also" be found. The
in" (quoted in) shows the quote was quoted by the source you used.
also ensures that if your source (here VanBeck) misquoted the original
(Stein here), you wouldn't be faulted for the misquote because you did not
find the original anyway.